↓ Skip to main content

High-Pressure-Sprayed Double Stranded RNA Does Not Induce RNA Interference of a Reporter Gene

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High-Pressure-Sprayed Double Stranded RNA Does Not Induce RNA Interference of a Reporter Gene
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, December 2020
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2020.534391
Pubmed ID
Authors

Veli Vural Uslu, Alexandra Bassler, Gabi Krczal, Michael Wassenegger

Abstract

In plants, RNA interference (RNAi) is an effective defense mechanism against pathogens and pests. RNAi mainly involves the micro RNA and the small interfering RNA (siRNA) pathways. The latter pathway is generally based on the processing of long double stranded RNAs (dsRNA) into siRNAs by DICER-LIKE endonucleases (DCLs). SiRNAs are loaded onto ARGONAUTE proteins to constitute the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC). Natural dsRNAs derive from transcription of inverted repeats or of specific RNA molecules that are transcribed by RNA-directed RNA polymerase 6 (RDR6). Moreover, replication of infecting viruses/viroids results in the production of dsRNA intermediates that can serve as substrates for DCLs. The high effectiveness of RNAi both locally and systemically implicated that plants could become resistant to pathogens, including viruses, through artificial activation of RNAi by topical exogenous application of dsRNA. The most preferable procedure to exploit RNAi would be to simply spray naked dsRNAs onto mature plants that are specific for the attacking pathogens serving as a substitute for pesticides applications. However, the plant cell wall is a difficult barrier to overcome and only few reports claim that topical application of naked dsRNA triggers RNAi in plants. Using a transgenic Nicotiana benthamiana line, we found that high-pressure-sprayed naked dsRNA did not induce silencing of a green fluorescence protein (GFP) reporter gene. Small RNA sequencing (sRNA-seq) of the samples from dsRNA sprayed leaves revealed that the dsRNA was, if at all, not efficiently processed into siRNAs indicating that the dsRNA was insufficiently taken up by plant cells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 20%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Student > Master 3 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 14 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 20%
Engineering 2 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 14 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2021.
All research outputs
#7,212,998
of 26,194,269 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#3,803
of 25,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,573
of 532,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#133
of 527 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,194,269 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,040 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 532,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 527 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.