The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Directing Trophic Divergence in Plant-Pathogen Interactions: Antagonistic Phytohormones With NO Doubt?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2020.600063 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shuanglong Huang, Xuehua Zhang, W. G. Dilantha Fernando |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
| Researcher | 4 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 19 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 21 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2020.
All research outputs
#13,201,027
of 23,267,128 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#5,761
of 21,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,361
of 509,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#206
of 548 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,267,128 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,046 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 509,311 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 548 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.