↓ Skip to main content

Corrigendum: FANCM Limits Meiotic Crossovers in Brassica Crops

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Corrigendum: FANCM Limits Meiotic Crossovers in Brassica Crops
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, December 2020
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2020.604728
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aurélien Blary, Adrián Gonzalo, Frédérique Eber, Aurélie Bérard, Hélène Bergès, Nadia Bessoltane, Delphine Charif, Catherine Charpentier, Laurence Cromer, Joelle Fourment, Camille Genevriez, Marie-Christine Le Paslier, Maryse Lodé, Marie-Odile Lucas, Nathalie Nesi, Andrew Lloyd, Anne-Marie Chèvre, Eric Jenczewski

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2021.
All research outputs
#18,778,496
of 23,270,775 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#14,296
of 21,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#378,882
of 508,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#413
of 557 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,270,775 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,047 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 508,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 557 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.