The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Genetic Variation for Economically Important Traits in Cupressus lusitanica in New Zealand
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, June 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2021.651729 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ahmed Ismael, Jaroslav Klápště, Grahame T. Stovold, Kane Fleet, Heidi Dungey |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
New Zealand | 2 | 50% |
Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2021.
All research outputs
#15,860,452
of 25,101,232 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#9,516
of 24,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,712
of 439,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#312
of 749 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,101,232 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,055 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,578 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 749 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.