The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 66 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Effects of Herbarium Specimen Characteristics on Short-Read NGS Sequencing Success in Nearly 8000 Specimens: Old, Degraded Samples Have Lower DNA Yields but Consistent Sequencing Success
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2021.669064 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Heather R. Kates, Joshua R. Doby, Carol M. Siniscalchi, Raphael LaFrance, Douglas E. Soltis, Pamela S. Soltis, Robert P. Guralnick, Ryan A. Folk |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Czechia | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 53 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 43 | 65% |
| Scientists | 20 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 13 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 38% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 25% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 13 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 90. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2024.
All research outputs
#503,526
of 26,519,936 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#100
of 25,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,397
of 460,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#5
of 823 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,519,936 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,322 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 460,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 823 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.