The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of the most widely cultivated superior clone Eucalyptus urophylla × E. grandis DH32-29 in Southern China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2022.1011245 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiaoping Wang, Shanshan Chen, Haonan Zhang, Ping Luo, Fangping Zhou, Bingshan Zeng, Jianmin Xu, Chunjie Fan |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 11% |
| Researcher | 1 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 67% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2024.
All research outputs
#8,505,071
of 25,366,663 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#5,632
of 24,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,931
of 431,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#220
of 1,444 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,366,663 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,433 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,444 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.