↓ Skip to main content

The Mechanisms Responsible for N Deficiency in Well-Watered Wheat Under Elevated CO2

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Mechanisms Responsible for N Deficiency in Well-Watered Wheat Under Elevated CO2
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, February 2022
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2022.801443
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jinjie Fan, Moshe Halpern, Yangliu Yu, Qiang Zuo, Jianchu Shi, Yuchuan Fan, Xun Wu, Uri Yermiyahu, Jiandong Sheng, Pingan Jiang, Alon Ben-Gal

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 17%
Researcher 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Unknown 8 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 8%
Unknown 8 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2022.
All research outputs
#13,410,854
of 23,146,350 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#6,155
of 20,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,114
of 437,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#251
of 1,106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,146,350 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,831 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.