The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Map-Based Cloning and Characterization of Br-dyp1, a Gene Conferring Dark Yellow Petal Color Trait in Chinese Cabbage (Brassica rapa L. ssp. pekinensis)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, February 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2022.841328 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shuangjuan Yang, Honglei Liu, Yanyan Zhao, Henan Su, Xiaochun Wei, Zhiyong Wang, Xiaobin Zhao, Xiao-Wei Zhang, Yuxiang Yuan |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2022.
All research outputs
#15,194,881
of 23,365,820 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#9,704
of 21,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#234,500
of 439,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#446
of 1,107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,365,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,263 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.