The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fine Mapping and Candidate Gene Analysis of BnC08.cds, a Recessive Gene Responsible for Sepal-Specific Chlorophyll-Deficiency in Brassica napus L.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2022.850330 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wei Zhang, Xiaoying Zhou, Feng Chen, Hongli Zhu, Rui Shi, Chengming Sun, Song Chen, Maolong Hu, Jiefu Zhang, Xiaodong Wang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2022.
All research outputs
#14,707,163
of 23,555,482 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#8,636
of 21,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,116
of 441,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#357
of 1,063 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,555,482 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,586 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,063 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.