The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Investigation of Enzymes in the Phthalide Biosynthetic Pathway in Angelica sinensis Using Integrative Metabolite Profiles and Transcriptome Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2022.928760 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wei-Meng Feng, Pei Liu, Hui Yan, Guang Yu, Sen Zhang, Shu Jiang, Er-Xin Shang, Da-Wei Qian, Jin-Ao Duan |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2022.
All research outputs
#14,858,030
of 22,882,389 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#9,308
of 20,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,491
of 436,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#442
of 1,335 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,882,389 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,270 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,335 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.