The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genomic methylation patterns in pre-meiotic gynoecia of wild-type and RdDM mutants of Arabidopsis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2023.1123211 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Quetzely Ortiz-Vasquez, Gloria León-Martínez, Carlos Barragán-Rosillo, Eduardo González-Orozco, Samuel Deans, Billy Aldridge, Martin Vickers, Xiaoqi Feng, Jean-Philippe Vielle-Calzada |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 17% |
| France | 1 | 17% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2023.
All research outputs
#7,443,221
of 24,022,746 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#4,518
of 22,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,912
of 407,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#137
of 1,192 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,022,746 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,390 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 407,939 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,192 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.