↓ Skip to main content

Physical mapping of a new powdery mildew resistance locus from Thinopyrum ponticum chromosome 4AgS

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physical mapping of a new powdery mildew resistance locus from Thinopyrum ponticum chromosome 4AgS
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, February 2023
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2023.1131205
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guotang Yang, Pingchuan Deng, Wanquan Ji, Shulan Fu, Hongwei Li, Bin Li, Zhensheng Li, Qi Zheng

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2023.
All research outputs
#20,064,197
of 25,523,622 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#14,454
of 24,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#301,949
of 426,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#855
of 1,353 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,523,622 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,782 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,353 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.