The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Volatile profiling as a potential biochemical marker for validation of gamma irradiation derived putative mutants in polyembryonic genotypes of mango (Mangifera indica L.)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, September 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2023.1168947 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nusrat Perveen, M. R. Dinesh, M. Sankaran, K. S. Shivashankara, K. V. Ravishankar, R. Venugopal, Hidayatullah Mir |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2023.
All research outputs
#15,381,441
of 26,289,377 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#7,093
of 25,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,056
of 362,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#121
of 918 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,289,377 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,063 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 918 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.