The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
CMRD-Net: a deep learning-based Cnaphalocrocis medinalis damage symptom rotated detection framework for in-field survey
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, June 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2023.1180716 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tianjiao Chen, Rujing Wang, Jianming Du, Hongbo Chen, Jie Zhang, Wei Dong, Meng Zhang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2023.
All research outputs
#19,592,525
of 24,954,788 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#14,024
of 23,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,935
of 368,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#428
of 870 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,954,788 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,885 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 870 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.