The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Metabolomics and transcriptomics analyses provide new insights into the nutritional quality during the endosperm development of different ploidy rice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, June 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2023.1210134 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lin Xian, Jiaqi Tian, Yanxi Long, Huijin Ma, Min Tian, Xiangdong Liu, Guoying Yin, Lan Wang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2023.
All research outputs
#17,371,336
of 26,267,662 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#11,303
of 25,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,917
of 388,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#350
of 961 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,267,662 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,059 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,304 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 961 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.