The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Intra- and interspecific ecophysiological responses to waterlogging stress in two contrasting waterlogging-tolerant arbor species
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, November 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2023.1257730 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mengjie Tian, Dadong Li, El-Hadji Malick Cisse, Lingfeng Miao, Jingjing Zhou, Weizong Yang, Boshen Chen, Lijun Li, Huimin Tian, Bingbing Ye, Fan Yang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2023.
All research outputs
#20,695,081
of 26,289,377 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#14,736
of 25,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#245,596
of 364,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#335
of 788 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,289,377 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,063 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 788 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.