↓ Skip to main content

Soil quality and ecological benefits assessment of alpine desertified grassland following different ecological restoration measures

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, October 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Soil quality and ecological benefits assessment of alpine desertified grassland following different ecological restoration measures
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, October 2023
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2023.1283457
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yiran Li, Sijia Hu, Shanxin Lang, Yulin Pu, Shirong Zhang, Ting Li, Xiaoxun Xu, Yongxia Jia, Guiyin Wang, Dagang Yuan, Yun Li

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 33%
Student > Master 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 1 17%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 17%
Computer Science 1 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 17%
Social Sciences 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2023.
All research outputs
#20,695,081
of 26,289,377 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#14,736
of 25,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#250,213
of 371,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#340
of 882 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,289,377 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,063 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,112 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 882 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.