The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Systematic identification of reference genes for qRT-PCR of Ardisia kteniophylla A. DC under different experimental conditions and for anthocyanin-related genes studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, November 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2023.1284007 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wentao Wang, Xiaohang Zhang, Xiaoxia Xu, Xingchou Xu, Lin Fu, Hongfeng Chen |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2023.
All research outputs
#20,695,081
of 26,289,377 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#14,736
of 25,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#250,942
of 372,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#341
of 865 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,289,377 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,063 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 865 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.