The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Geographically associated endophytic fungi contribute to the tropane alkaloids accumulation of Anisodus tanguticus
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, November 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2023.1297546 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Bo Wang, Chen Chen, Yuanming Xiao, Yan He, Ying Gao, Zongxiu Kang, Xiaoxuan Wei, Yujie Deng, Shihong Feng, Guoying Zhou |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2024.
All research outputs
#3,381,222
of 26,289,377 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#1,576
of 25,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,260
of 387,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#17
of 763 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,289,377 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,063 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 763 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.