The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Partial root-zone drying subsurface drip irrigation increased the alfalfa quality yield but decreased the alfalfa quality content
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2024.1297468 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yadong Wang, Chong Xu, Qian Gu, Yalong Shi, Jiale Chen, Honghui Wu, Jing He, Xingfu Li, Liliang Han, Derong Su |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2024.
All research outputs
#21,529,259
of 26,424,855 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#17,414
of 25,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,676
of 380,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#504
of 730 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,424,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,226 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 380,535 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 730 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.