↓ Skip to main content

Meta-QTL analysis and candidate genes for quality traits, mineral content, and abiotic-related traits in wild emmer

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Meta-QTL analysis and candidate genes for quality traits, mineral content, and abiotic-related traits in wild emmer
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, March 2024
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2024.1305196
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patricia Cabas-Lühmann, Andrés R. Schwember, Osvin Arriagada, Ilaria Marcotuli, Iván Matus, Christian Alfaro, Agata Gadaleta

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 2 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2024.
All research outputs
#22,854,939
of 25,483,400 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#19,800
of 24,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,381
of 159,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#278
of 394 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,483,400 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,743 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 394 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.