The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Histological, chemical and gene expression differences between western redcedar seedlings resistant and susceptible to cedar leaf blight
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2024.1309762 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Juan A. Aldana, Belaid Moa, Jim Mattsson, John H. Russell, Barbara J. Hawkins |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2024.
All research outputs
#15,289,790
of 26,430,863 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#6,840
of 25,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,617
of 380,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#96
of 730 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,430,863 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,242 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 380,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 730 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.