You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comprehensive analysis of sesame LRR-RLKs: structure, evolution and dynamic expression profiles under Macrophomina phaseolina stress
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2024.1334189 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wenqing Yan, Yunxia Ni, Hui Zhao, Xintao Liu, Min Jia, Xinbei Zhao, Yongdong Li, Hongmei Miao, Hongyan Liu, Haiyang Zhang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2024.
All research outputs
#17,834,431
of 26,124,608 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#13,125
of 25,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,577
of 375,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#233
of 785 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,124,608 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,008 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 785 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.