You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Genomic incongruence accompanies the evolution of flower symmetry in Eudicots: a case study in the poppy family (Papaveraceae, Ranunculales)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, June 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2024.1340056 |
Authors |
Lisa Pokorny, Jaume Pellicer, Yannick Woudstra, Maarten J. M. Christenhusz, Teresa Garnatje, Luis Palazzesi, Matthew G. Johnson, Olivier Maurin, Elaine Françoso, Shyamali Roy, Ilia J. Leitch, Félix Forest, William J. Baker, Oriane Hidalgo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sweden | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 26 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 15 | 56% |
Scientists | 11 | 41% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2024.
All research outputs
#2,121,131
of 26,210,036 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#780
of 25,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,831
of 202,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#1
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,210,036 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,047 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.