The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Editorial: Structural variation of the chloroplast genome and related bioinformatics tools
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, April 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2024.1341528 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Linchun Shi, Gang Zhang, Tapan Kumar Mohanta, Weijun Kong, Baozhong Duan |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Lecturer | 1 | 100% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 100% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2024.
All research outputs
#4,970,942
of 25,901,238 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#2,636
of 24,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,709
of 278,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#19
of 384 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,901,238 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,958 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,617 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 384 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.