The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Integrated transcriptomics and metabolomics analyses of the effects of bagging treatment on carotenoid biosynthesis and regulation of Areca catechu L.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2024.1364945 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xin Zheng, Liyun Huang, Benyi Fan, Chunlin Peng, Amjad Iqbal, Yujie Zhang, Hongman Chen, Jianqiu Ye, Yaodong Yang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
| Scientists | 2 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2024.
All research outputs
#7,264,632
of 26,563,001 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#3,794
of 25,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,856
of 353,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#48
of 451 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,563,001 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,340 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 451 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.