You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Exploring the potentials of Sesuvium portulacastrum L. for edibility and bioremediation of saline soils
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, June 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2024.1387102 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wenbin Zhang, Dan Wang, Dingding Cao, Jianjun Chen, Xiangying Wei |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2024.
All research outputs
#8,804,541
of 26,181,776 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#5,689
of 25,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,239
of 196,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#15
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,181,776 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,038 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,186 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.