The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessing performance of simplified bioassays for soil-borne pathogens in smallholder systems of western Kenya
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, August 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2024.1389285 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joyce C. Mutai, Jane E. Stewart, Beth Medvecky, John T. Dobbs, Steven J. Vanek, John Ojiem, Gabriel Chege, Steven J. Fonte |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2024.
All research outputs
#21,631,831
of 26,556,730 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#17,380
of 25,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,167
of 184,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#85
of 276 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,556,730 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,338 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,595 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 276 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.