↓ Skip to main content

CTHNet: a network for wheat ear counting with local-global features fusion based on hybrid architecture

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, July 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CTHNet: a network for wheat ear counting with local-global features fusion based on hybrid architecture
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, July 2024
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2024.1425131
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qingqing Hong, Wei Liu, Yue Zhu, Tianyu Ren, Changrong Shi, Zhixin Lu, Yunqin Yang, Ruiting Deng, Jing Qian, Changwei Tan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2024.
All research outputs
#23,564,083
of 26,237,895 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#20,128
of 25,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,541
of 147,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#32
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,237,895 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,051 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 147,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.