The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A fungal endophyte induces local cell wall–mediated resistance in wheat roots against take-all disease
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Plant Science, September 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpls.2024.1444271 |
Authors |
Chancellor, Tania, Smith, Daniel P., Chen, Wanxin, Clark, Suzanne J., Venter, Eudri, Halsey, Kirstie, Carrera, Esther, McMillan, Vanessa, Canning, Gail, Armer, Victoria J., Hammond-Kosack, Kim E., Palma-Guerrero, Javier |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2024.
All research outputs
#15,910,035
of 26,233,985 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#8,769
of 25,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,784
of 128,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#22
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,233,985 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,368 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,820 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.