↓ Skip to main content

Editorial: Study on plant differentiation between beneficial and pathogenic microorganisms

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Plant Science, September 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Editorial: Study on plant differentiation between beneficial and pathogenic microorganisms
Published in
Frontiers in Plant Science, September 2024
DOI 10.3389/fpls.2024.1481110
Authors

Jimena Carrillo-Tripp, Sergio de los Santos-Villalobos, Edgardo Sepúlveda, Domingo Martínez-Soto

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2024.
All research outputs
#18,183,644
of 26,601,484 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Plant Science
#13,379
of 25,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,586
of 130,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Plant Science
#45
of 181 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,601,484 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,358 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 181 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.