↓ Skip to main content

Do Action Video Games Improve Perception and Cognition?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
twitter
25 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
6 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
372 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
878 Mendeley
citeulike
9 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Do Action Video Games Improve Perception and Cognition?
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00226
Pubmed ID
Authors

Walter R. Boot, Daniel P. Blakely, Daniel J. Simons

Abstract

Frequent action video game players often outperform non-gamers on measures of perception and cognition, and some studies find that video game practice enhances those abilities. The possibility that video game training transfers broadly to other aspects of cognition is exciting because training on one task rarely improves performance on others. At first glance, the cumulative evidence suggests a strong relationship between gaming experience and other cognitive abilities, but methodological shortcomings call that conclusion into question. We discuss these pitfalls, identify how existing studies succeed or fail in overcoming them, and provide guidelines for more definitive tests of the effects of gaming on cognition.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 878 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 21 2%
Italy 6 <1%
United Kingdom 6 <1%
Canada 5 <1%
Spain 4 <1%
Germany 4 <1%
Australia 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Poland 3 <1%
Other 15 2%
Unknown 808 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 196 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 144 16%
Student > Master 133 15%
Researcher 105 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 36 4%
Other 142 16%
Unknown 122 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 392 45%
Computer Science 62 7%
Social Sciences 54 6%
Neuroscience 38 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 3%
Other 140 16%
Unknown 162 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 108. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#406,901
of 26,194,269 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#851
of 35,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,616
of 194,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#9
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,194,269 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,773 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.