The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Old and New Ideas for Data Screening and Assumption Testing for Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00055 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David B. Flora, Cathy LaBrish, R. Philip Chalmers |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 274 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Macao | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 268 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 48 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 13% |
| Researcher | 34 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 8% |
| Other | 52 | 19% |
| Unknown | 58 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 92 | 34% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 28 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 22 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 6% |
| Engineering | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 43 | 16% |
| Unknown | 64 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2019.
All research outputs
#16,077,455
of 25,418,993 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#17,035
of 34,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,396
of 250,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#268
of 481 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,418,993 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,478 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,205 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 481 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.