↓ Skip to main content

Perception of Words and Pitch Patterns in Song and Speech

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Perception of Words and Pitch Patterns in Song and Speech
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00076
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julia Merrill, Daniela Sammler, Marc Bangert, Dirk Goldhahn, Gabriele Lohmann, Robert Turner, Angela D. Friederici

Abstract

THIS FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING STUDY EXAMINES SHARED AND DISTINCT CORTICAL AREAS INVOLVED IN THE AUDITORY PERCEPTION OF SONG AND SPEECH AT THE LEVEL OF THEIR UNDERLYING CONSTITUENTS: words and pitch patterns. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to isolate the neural correlates of the word- and pitch-based discrimination between song and speech, corrected for rhythmic differences in both. Therefore, six conditions, arranged in a subtractive hierarchy were created: sung sentences including words, pitch and rhythm; hummed speech prosody and song melody containing only pitch patterns and rhythm; and as a control the pure musical or speech rhythm. Systematic contrasts between these balanced conditions following their hierarchical organization showed a great overlap between song and speech at all levels in the bilateral temporal lobe, but suggested a differential role of the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and intraparietal sulcus (IPS) in processing song and speech. While the left IFG coded for spoken words and showed predominance over the right IFG in prosodic pitch processing, an opposite lateralization was found for pitch in song. The IPS showed sensitivity to discrete pitch relations in song as opposed to the gliding pitch in speech. Finally, the superior temporal gyrus and premotor cortex coded for general differences between words and pitch patterns, irrespective of whether they were sung or spoken. Thus, song and speech share many features which are reflected in a fundamental similarity of brain areas involved in their perception. However, fine-grained acoustic differences on word and pitch level are reflected in the IPS and the lateralized activity of the IFG.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 1%
United States 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 171 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 27%
Researcher 30 16%
Student > Master 22 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 8%
Professor 12 6%
Other 40 22%
Unknown 17 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 52 28%
Neuroscience 33 18%
Linguistics 19 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 9%
Arts and Humanities 11 6%
Other 31 17%
Unknown 23 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2021.
All research outputs
#3,452,406
of 26,367,306 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#6,640
of 35,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,514
of 254,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#97
of 481 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,367,306 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 481 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.