↓ Skip to main content

Attention and Visuospatial Working Memory Share the Same Processing Resources

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Attention and Visuospatial Working Memory Share the Same Processing Resources
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00103
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jing Feng, Jay Pratt, Ian Spence

Abstract

Attention and visuospatial working memory (VWM) share very similar characteristics; both have the same upper bound of about four items in capacity and they recruit overlapping brain regions. We examined whether both attention and VWM share the same processing resources using a novel dual-task costs approach based on a load-varying dual-task technique. With sufficiently large loads on attention and VWM, considerable interference between the two processes was observed. A further load increase on either process produced reciprocal increases in interference on both processes, indicating that attention and VWM share common resources. More critically, comparison among four experiments on the reciprocal interference effects, as measured by the dual-task costs, demonstrates no significant contribution from additional processing other than the shared processes. These results support the notion that attention and VWM share the same processing resources.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 101 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 16%
Student > Master 17 16%
Student > Bachelor 14 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 9%
Other 21 20%
Unknown 15 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 47 44%
Neuroscience 8 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 7%
Engineering 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 20 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2013.
All research outputs
#15,270,698
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#18,477
of 29,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,247
of 244,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#320
of 481 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 481 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.