↓ Skip to main content

Does Filtering Preclude Us from Studying ERP Time-Courses?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
113 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
284 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does Filtering Preclude Us from Studying ERP Time-Courses?
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00131
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guillaume A. Rousselet

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 284 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 6 2%
United States 4 1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 259 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 75 26%
Researcher 51 18%
Student > Master 48 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 7%
Student > Bachelor 14 5%
Other 47 17%
Unknown 28 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 94 33%
Neuroscience 47 17%
Engineering 32 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 9%
Computer Science 14 5%
Other 28 10%
Unknown 43 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2019.
All research outputs
#15,867,545
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#19,563
of 31,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,911
of 247,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#318
of 482 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 482 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.