↓ Skip to main content

Up to “Me” or Up to “Us”? The Impact of Self-Construal Priming on Cognitive Self-Other Integration

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Up to “Me” or Up to “Us”? The Impact of Self-Construal Priming on Cognitive Self-Other Integration
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00341
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lorenza S. Colzato, Ellen R. A. de Bruijn, Bernhard Hommel

Abstract

The degree to which people construe their perceived self as independent from or interdependent with their social environment can vary. We tested whether the current degree of social self-construal predicts the degree to which individuals integrate others into their self-concept. Participants worked through tasks that drew attention to either personal interdependence (e.g., by instructing participants to circle all relational pronouns in a text, such as "we," "our," or "us") or independence (by having them to circle pronouns such as "I," "my," or "me") and were compared with respect to the social Simon effect (SSE) - an index of the degree to which people co-represent the actions of a co-actor. As predicted, the SSE was more pronounced in the interdependence group than in the independence group, suggesting that self-other integration varies dynamically as a function of the relative saliency of the other.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Taiwan 1 1%
Unknown 85 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 17%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 15 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 46 51%
Neuroscience 7 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 17 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2012.
All research outputs
#18,314,922
of 22,678,224 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#21,835
of 29,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,977
of 244,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#381
of 481 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,678,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 481 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.