Title |
The Role of Number Notation: Sign-Value Notation Number Processing is Easier than Place-Value
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2012
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00463 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Attila Krajcsi, Eszter Szabó |
Abstract |
Number notations can influence the way numbers are handled in computations; however, the role of notation itself in mental processing has not been examined directly. From a mathematical point of view, it is believed that place-value number notation systems, such as the Indo-Arabic numbers, are superior to sign-value systems, such as the Roman numbers. However, sign-value notation might have sufficient efficiency; for example, sign-value notations were common in flourishing cultures, such as in ancient Egypt. Herein we compared artificial sign-value and place-value notations in simple numerical tasks. We found that, contrary to the dominant view, sign-value notation can be applied more easily than place-value notation for multi-power comparison and addition tasks. Our results are consistent with the popularity of sign-value notations that prevailed for centuries. To explain the notation effect, we propose a natural multi-power number representation based on the numerical representation of objects. |
X Demographics
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 22% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 6 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
Scientists | 3 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 11% |
Hungary | 1 | 6% |
Spain | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 14 | 78% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 22% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
Professor | 2 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 11% |
Other | 4 | 22% |
Unknown | 2 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 11 | 61% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 6% |
Linguistics | 1 | 6% |
Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 2 | 11% |