↓ Skip to main content

Subitizing and visual short-term memory in human and non-human species: a common shared system?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Subitizing and visual short-term memory in human and non-human species: a common shared system?
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00469
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simone Cutini, Mario Bonato

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Unknown 39 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 17%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Student > Master 4 10%
Professor 3 7%
Other 8 19%
Unknown 4 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 24 57%
Neuroscience 5 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 6 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2014.
All research outputs
#14,059,138
of 25,016,456 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#12,519
of 33,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,779
of 255,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#206
of 481 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,016,456 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,618 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 481 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.