↓ Skip to main content

Corrigendum: Cognitive training with casual video games: points to consider

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Corrigendum: Cognitive training with casual video games: points to consider
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, March 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00234
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pauline L. Baniqued, Michael B. Kranz, Michelle W. Voss, Hyunkyu Lee, Joshua D. Cosman, Joan Severson, Arthur F. Kramer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 6%
Unknown 17 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Lecturer 1 6%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 6 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 8 44%
Neuroscience 2 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Unknown 7 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2014.
All research outputs
#15,299,919
of 22,754,104 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#18,570
of 29,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,752
of 223,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#148
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,754,104 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,659 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,366 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.