↓ Skip to main content

Switching between global and local levels: the level repetition effect and its hemispheric asymmetry

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Switching between global and local levels: the level repetition effect and its hemispheric asymmetry
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, March 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00252
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luc Kéïta, Nathalie Bedoin, Jacob A. Burack, Franco Lepore

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 4%
Canada 1 4%
Unknown 22 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 3 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 11 46%
Mathematics 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Physics and Astronomy 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 7 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2014.
All research outputs
#17,700,438
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#21,557
of 34,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,576
of 239,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#168
of 229 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,760 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,879 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 229 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.