Title |
The role of intrinsic motivations in attention allocation and shifting
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, April 2014
|
DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00273 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Dario Di Nocera, Alberto Finzi, Silvia Rossi, Mariacarla Staffa |
Abstract |
The concepts of attention and intrinsic motivations are of great interest within adaptive robotic systems, and can be exploited in order to guide, activate, and coordinate multiple concurrent behaviors. Attention allocation strategies represent key capabilities of human beings, which are strictly connected with action selection and execution mechanisms, while intrinsic motivations directly affect the allocation of attentional resources. In this paper we propose a model of Reinforcement Learning (RL), where both these capabilities are involved. RL is deployed to learn how to allocate attentional resources in a behavior-based robotic system, while action selection is obtained as a side effect of the resulting motivated attentional behaviors. Moreover, the influence of intrinsic motivations in attention orientation is obtained by introducing rewards associated with curiosity drives. In this way, the learning process is affected not only by goal-specific rewards, but also by intrinsic motivations. |
X Demographics
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Ireland | 1 | 2% |
Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 64 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 21% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 12% |
Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 9% |
Researcher | 4 | 6% |
Other | 12 | 18% |
Unknown | 15 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 20 | 30% |
Computer Science | 7 | 11% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 5% |
Other | 13 | 20% |
Unknown | 16 | 24% |