↓ Skip to main content

Approach, avoidance, and affect: a meta-analysis of approach-avoidance tendencies in manual reaction time tasks

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
250 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
349 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Approach, avoidance, and affect: a meta-analysis of approach-avoidance tendencies in manual reaction time tasks
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, May 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00378
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. Hans Phaf, Sören E. Mohr, Mark Rotteveel, Jelte M. Wicherts

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 349 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Croatia 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 340 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 90 26%
Student > Master 53 15%
Student > Bachelor 45 13%
Researcher 38 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 7%
Other 43 12%
Unknown 55 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 179 51%
Neuroscience 24 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 4%
Social Sciences 12 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 3%
Other 37 11%
Unknown 74 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2024.
All research outputs
#4,634,519
of 26,574,355 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#8,032
of 35,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,735
of 243,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#103
of 332 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,574,355 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,518 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,135 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 332 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.