The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The early development of executive function and its relation to social interaction: a brief review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00388 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yusuke Moriguchi |
| Abstract |
Executive function (EF) refers to the ability to execute appropriate actions and to inhibit inappropriate actions for the attainment of a specific goal. Research has shown that this ability develops rapidly during the preschool years. Recently, it has been proposed that research on EF should consider the importance of social interaction. In this article, recent evidence regarding the early development of EF and its relation to social interaction has been reviewed. Research consistently showed that social interaction can influence EF skills in young children. However, the development of EF may facilitate the cognitive skills that are important for social interaction. Taken together, there might be functional dependency between the development of EF and social interaction. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 14 | 82% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 18% |
| Scientists | 2 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 327 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 317 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 60 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 45 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 45 | 14% |
| Researcher | 31 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 28 | 9% |
| Other | 53 | 16% |
| Unknown | 65 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 165 | 50% |
| Social Sciences | 24 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 15 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 3% |
| Other | 31 | 9% |
| Unknown | 72 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2023.
All research outputs
#4,269,730
of 25,838,141 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#7,422
of 34,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,532
of 243,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#104
of 334 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,838,141 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,815 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,055 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 334 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.