↓ Skip to main content

Developing embodied cognition: insights from children’s concepts and language processing

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
13 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
108 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
244 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Developing embodied cognition: insights from children’s concepts and language processing
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, May 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00506
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michele Wellsby, Penny M. Pexman

Abstract

Over the past decade, theories of embodied cognition have become increasingly influential with research demonstrating that sensorimotor experiences are involved in cognitive processing; however, this embodied research has primarily focused on adult cognition. The notion that sensorimotor experience is important for acquiring conceptual knowledge is not a novel concept for developmental researchers, and yet theories of embodied cognition often do not fully integrate developmental findings. We propose that in order for an embodied cognition perspective to be refined and advanced as a lifelong theory of cognition, it is important to consider what can be learned from research with children. In this paper, we focus on development of concepts and language processing, and examine the importance of children's embodied experiences for these aspects of cognition in particular. Following this review, we outline what we see as important developmental issues that need to be addressed in order to determine the extent to which language and conceptual knowledge are embodied and to refine theories of embodied cognition.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 231 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 24%
Student > Master 32 13%
Researcher 27 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 9%
Student > Bachelor 22 9%
Other 40 16%
Unknown 42 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 95 39%
Social Sciences 26 11%
Linguistics 16 7%
Computer Science 8 3%
Neuroscience 8 3%
Other 35 14%
Unknown 56 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2021.
All research outputs
#551,277
of 23,520,142 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#1,119
of 31,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,381
of 228,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#25
of 359 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,520,142 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,357 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 359 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.