The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Global processing in amblyopia: a review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00583 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lisa M. Hamm, Joanna Black, Shuan Dai, Benjamin Thompson |
| Abstract |
Amblyopia is a neurodevelopmental disorder of the visual system that is associated with disrupted binocular vision during early childhood. There is evidence that the effects of amblyopia extend beyond the primary visual cortex to regions of the dorsal and ventral extra-striate visual cortex involved in visual integration. Here, we review the current literature on global processing deficits in observers with either strabismic, anisometropic, or deprivation amblyopia. A range of global processing tasks have been used to investigate the extent of the cortical deficit in amblyopia including: global motion perception, global form perception, face perception, and biological motion. These tasks appear to be differentially affected by amblyopia. In general, observers with unilateral amblyopia appear to show deficits for local spatial processing and global tasks that require the segregation of signal from noise. In bilateral cases, the global processing deficits are exaggerated, and appear to extend to specialized perceptual systems such as those involved in face processing. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 162 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 26 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 23 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 11% |
| Researcher | 16 | 9% |
| Other | 37 | 22% |
| Unknown | 26 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 26% |
| Psychology | 27 | 16% |
| Neuroscience | 24 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Unknown | 40 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2014.
All research outputs
#7,452,489
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#10,895
of 29,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,518
of 228,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#178
of 386 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,698 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 386 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.