↓ Skip to main content

From memory to prospection: what are the overlapping and the distinct components between remembering and imagining?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
From memory to prospection: what are the overlapping and the distinct components between remembering and imagining?
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, August 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00856
Pubmed ID
Authors

Huimin Zheng, Jiayi Luo, Rongjun Yu

Abstract

Reflecting on past events and reflecting on future events are two fundamentally different processes, each traveling in the opposite direction of the other through conceptual time. But what we are able to imagine seems to be constrained by what we have previously experienced, suggesting a close link between memory and prospection. Recent theories suggest that recalling the past lies at the core of imagining and planning for the future. The existence of this link is supported by evidence gathered from neuroimaging, lesion, and developmental studies. Yet it is not clear exactly how the novel episodes people construct in their sense of the future develop out of their historical memories. There must be intermediary processes that utilize memory as a basis on which to generate future oriented thinking. Here, we review studies on goal-directed processing, associative learning, cognitive control, and creativity and link them with research on prospection. We suggest that memory cooperates with additional functions like goal-directed learning to construct and simulate novel events, especially self-referential events. The coupling between memory-related hippocampus and other brain regions may underlie such memory-based prospection. Abnormalities in this constructive process may contribute to mental disorders such as schizophrenia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Spain 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 139 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 29%
Researcher 22 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 9%
Student > Master 13 9%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Other 25 17%
Unknown 20 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 69 46%
Neuroscience 9 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 5%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 33 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2014.
All research outputs
#3,672,028
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#6,306
of 29,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,040
of 230,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#112
of 380 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,671 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 380 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.