↓ Skip to main content

Effects of interleaved and blocked study on delayed test of category learning generalization

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of interleaved and blocked study on delayed test of category learning generalization
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, August 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00936
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paulo F. Carvalho, Robert L. Goldstone

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Switzerland 2 2%
Canada 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Unknown 111 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 18%
Student > Bachelor 20 17%
Student > Master 13 11%
Researcher 11 9%
Other 7 6%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 25 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 53 45%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 6%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 26 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2018.
All research outputs
#15,361,255
of 22,851,489 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#18,726
of 29,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,410
of 235,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#300
of 383 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,851,489 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,874 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 383 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.