↓ Skip to main content

The componential processing of fractions in adults and children: effects of stimuli variability and contextual interference

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The componential processing of fractions in adults and children: effects of stimuli variability and contextual interference
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, September 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00981
Pubmed ID
Authors

Li Zhang, Qiaochu Fang, Florence C. Gabriel, Dénes Szücs

Abstract

Recent studies have indicated that people have a strong tendency to compare fractions based on constituent numerators or denominators. This is called componential processing. This study explored whether componential processing was preferred in tasks involving high stimuli variability and high contextual interference, when fractions could be compared based either on the holistic values of fractions or on their denominators. Here, stimuli variability referred to the fact that fractions were not monotonous but diversiform. Contextual interference referred to the fact that the processing of fractions was interfered by other stimuli. To our ends, three tasks were used. In Task 1, participants compared a standard fraction 1/5 to unit fractions. This task was used as a low stimuli variability and low contextual interference task. In Task 2 stimuli variability was increased by mixing unit and non-unit fractions. In Task 3, high contextual interference was created by incorporating decimals into fractions. The RT results showed that the processing patterns of fractions were very similar for adults and children. In task 1 and task 3, only componential processing was utilzied. In contrast, both holistic processing and componential processing were utilized in task 2. These results suggest that, if individuals are presented with the opportunity to perform componential processing, both adults and children will tend to do so, even if they are faced with high variability of fractions or high contextual interference.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 27 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 18%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Researcher 2 7%
Other 6 21%
Unknown 3 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 10 36%
Social Sciences 5 18%
Mathematics 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Physics and Astronomy 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 6 21%