↓ Skip to main content

The perspectival shift: how experiments on unconscious processing don't justify the claims made for them

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Psychology, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
89 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The perspectival shift: how experiments on unconscious processing don't justify the claims made for them
Published in
Frontiers in Psychology, September 2014
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01067
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tom Stafford

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 89 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 5%
Germany 1 2%
Ireland 1 2%
France 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 48 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 18%
Researcher 10 18%
Student > Master 10 18%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Professor 5 9%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 4 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 32 57%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Computer Science 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 7 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 83. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2022.
All research outputs
#547,589
of 26,402,896 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#1,144
of 35,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,150
of 261,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#20
of 365 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,402,896 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 35,329 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,268 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 365 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.